Reflective writing- Abortion is not Always Immoral

When I say that abortion is not always immoral, I mean that for the most part, it is moral.  The only time it is immoral is when it’s done in the late stages of pregnancy not for reasons pertaining to saving the mother’s life or for severe fetal defects.

Women have the right to choose when, how often, and under what circumstances they become mothers.  It’s no one else’s choice but theirs.  If a new child is going to cause the mother extreme hardship, whether it’s social, economical, physical, or emotional, it’s her choice to terminate the pregnancy.  Her life, and the lives of any children she already has, are more valuable than that of an embryo.  Her rights matter more than the quasi-rights of the fetus.

Abortion is not murder, because a fetus is not a person.

People think that deciding to have an abortion is as easy as deciding what clothes to wear or what to have for breakfast.  It’s not.  It’s a hard decision to make, and it’s heartbreaking.  That’s why I am pro-choice.  This is a decision only the woman affected can make.  There are instances she shouldn’t though, meaning late term abortions for convenience.  After a fetus is viable, it shouldn’t be aborted unless the mother’s life is in extreme danger, or the discovery has been made late in the pregnancy of severe fetal defect.

Abortion is not Always Immoral- PHIL 1120

Julie Stinson

Gregory Spendlove

PHIL 1120-001

November 18, 2016

 

Abortion is not Always Immoral

Abortion is not always immoral. A woman has the right to life, the right of self-determination, right to privacy, and the right to physical integrity. A fetus is not a person, and therefore has no rights. A fetus is not a person, therefore abortion is not murder. A fetus has quasi-rights, whereas a pregnant woman has actual rights, and actual rights trump quasi-rights. A woman should be able to decide when, how often, and under what circumstances she becomes a mother. Abortion is not always moral. In late pregnancy, after viability has been reached, it is immoral for a woman to have an abortion. It is also immoral for her to have a late-term abortion without a valid, compelling reason.

A pregnant woman has the right to decide whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. The fetus is not a person because it does not have the necessary traits of personhood. If a fetus is not a person, then abortion is not murder. Jane English in her essay Abortion and the Concept of a Person defines personhood as having five factors: the biological factor (being a human being, having extremities, eating and sleeping), the psychological factor (sentience, having a concept of self and of one’s own interests and desires), the rationality factor (ability to reason, ability to generalize and learn from past experience), the social sector (ability to sympathize, love, ability to work in groups), and the legal factor (being counted in the census, having a name and citizenship). (235) A fetus is a human life form, but it is not a person because it does not have all of the qualities that make it so. (Gordon, section 2) In her essay A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson says “a newly fertilized ovum, a newly implanted clump of cells, is no more a person than an acorn is an oak tree.” (48). A fetus is a human life form due to its genetic code, but is not a person. Being a human life form is not sufficient grounds to grant it legal and moral rights. (Gordon, section 2)

A pregnant woman’s rights trump the quasi-rights of the fetus. She has the right to life, the right of self-determination, right to privacy, and the right to physical integrity. Her life is more valuable than that of the fetus. “Nobody is required to make large sacrifices, of health, of all other interests and concerns, of all other duties and commitments… in order to keep a person alive.” (Thomson, 60) The fetus does have a quasi-right to live, but the right to live doesn’t include the right to not be killed. It doesn’t include the right to be given the means necessary for survival.   The pregnant woman has the right to decide what happens with her body. She has the right to make the decision of what will be best for her and her family.

A woman should be able to decide when, how often, and under what circumstances she becomes a mother. (Davis, 207) In the early stages, abortion is permissible when it’s in the best interests of the pregnant woman or her family. In the middle stages, it’s only permissible when the continuation would cause harm to her or her family, such as physical, psychological, economic, or social. In the late stages, it is only permissible in cases of severe fetal disability/maldevelopment, to save the life of the mother. A pregnant woman can abort before the age of viability if she has been raped, if the pregnancy threatens her life, or the pregnancy and child will cause extreme hardship for her and her family. Working class women have a special need for the right to plan and space their pregnancies autonomously. They are engaged in a far more fundamental fight for survival. (Davis, 210). If a woman cannot support a pregnancy and child, she can choose to abort. She may not have the economic status to support a pregnancy to be able to give the child up for adoption. She may be outcast socially if her community learns a child was conceived out of wedlock, or if she’s dependent on welfare to support herself, her children, and another pregnancy. Her life, and the lives of any children she already has, are more important than that of a clump of cells that has yet to become a person.

The opposing point of view to my thesis is that all abortion is immoral. Don Marquis states in his essay Why Abortion is Immoral that killing someone is wrong because it inflicts one of the greatest losses possible, the loss of a future. (189) In this essay, he states that fetuses are human, and it’s morally wrong to kill another human being, and that personhood doesn’t matter. He believes that fetuses have valuable futures identical to adult human beings and children. His discontinuation account states that killing is wrong because of the discontinuation of the valuable experience of living. The desire account states that killing is wrong because it interferes with the fulfillment of a strong and fundamental desire to continue to live. (Marquis, 195) However, in order for a person’s future to have value, they have to value it. Fetuses cannot value their lives, so their futures are not valuable to them. Fetuses do not have experiences, activities, and projects to be continued or discontinued. The discontinuation of these things is what makes killing wrong. Furthermore, fetuses do not have a strong and fundamental desire to continue to live, as they are not aware that they are living, or of the values of having a life, or future. Because fetuses do not have a desire to live, a desire to continue living, and cannot value a future, abortion is not immoral.

Once the age of viability has been reached, 24 weeks gestation, it is immoral for a woman to have an abortion except in cases to save the life of the mother or severe fetal maldevelopment. It is immoral for her to have an abortion simply for convenience, such as a vacation. There has to be strong, compelling evidence that necessitates an abortion at this point of the pregnancy. Such evidence would be that continuing the pregnancy would greatly risk the mother’s life, such as severe cases of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or other non-pregnancy related medical issues, such as cancer. It would also be permissible to abort if the discovery was made late in the pregnancy of severe defects in the fetus, resulting in a short life of pain, suffering, and imminent death. It doesn’t occur often that these types of defects are found late in the pregnancy, but it would be cruel and inhumane to make a newborn suffer in excruciating pain and struggle to live, then die, simply because it is believed that abortion in the third trimester is immoral.

Abortion is not always immoral. A woman has the right to life, self-determination, privacy, and physical integrity. Fetuses are not persons, therefore abortion is not murder. Women have the right to determine, when, how often, and under what circumstances they become mothers. Abortion is immoral in the late stages of pregnancy except in cases of saving the mother’s life or extreme fetal defects. Only the woman affected can decide whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. If it is going to cause her extreme hardship, if she became pregnant due to rape, or if it puts her life in jeopardy, a woman can choose to abort. Simply because another life form is dependent on her does not mean she has to keep it alive. Her right to live is more important than the right to life of the fetus. The fetus has the right to life, but not the right to not be killed.

 

Works Cited

Angela Davis, “Racism, Birth Control, and Reproductive Rights.” Women, Race, and Class. (New York: Vintage Books, 1983), p. 202-210, 213-216, 218.

Jane English, “Abortion and the Concept of a Person” Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Vol 5, No. 2, October 1972, p. 233-243.

Don Marquis, “Why Abortion is Immoral,” The Journal of Philosophy, Vol 86, No. 4, April 1989, p. 189-201.

Judith Jarvis Thomson, “A Defense of Abortion,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol 1, No. 1, 1971, p. 47-53, 55-61, 65-66.

John-Stewart Gordon, “Abortion,” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. November 17, 2016. www.iep.utm.edu/abortion.

Bad Boss Nightmare

Bad Boss Nightmare: How to Handle Stressful Situations in A Retail Environment

Submitted By: Catherine Bee, James Manzanares, and Julie Stinson

Salt Lake Community College COMM1010-F16-PACK October 31, 2016


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………….2

Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………….3
Project Description………………………………………………………………3
Case Study…………………………………………………………………………3
Identifying The Problem……………………………………………………….3
Why It’s Important……………………………….…………………………….3 Solution………………………………..………………………………………….3 Methods……………………………..…………………………………………….4

Project Description ………………………………………………………..5
Case Study…………………………………………………………………………5
Designing the Training Program……………………………………………………………….6 Developing the Training Program……………………………………………………………..6 Implementation of the Training Program……………………………………………………8 Evaluating the Training Program………………………………………………………………8

Methods…………………………………………………………………………………….10
Past Solutions…………………………………………………………………………………….10 Brainstormed Solutions……………………………………………………….11 Contingencies……………………………………………………………………11
How To Solve Contingencies…………………………………………………12
Solution Criteria………………………………………………………………..12
Solution Table…………………………………………………………………..13

Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………15

Works Cited and Consulted……………………………………………………………..16


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CASE STUDY:  The case study is an actual situation which unfolded on a busy Saturday afternoon in a local Salt Lake City Walmart Supercenter. It is a perfect example of a situation between two managers that was caused by bad reactions to stressful situations. This is the case we based our solutions and group project on.

IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM:  Walmart is a stressful place to work when the store is understaffed and associates can’t keep up with issues that compact on each other. Too often we become victim to the stress and pressure, and inadvertently lash out at other associates. We need to teach and train our associates how to cope with the stress of a busy, overwhelming work environment, and how to respond to other associates when they are treated with disrespect and hostility.

WHY IT’S IMPORTANT:   It is important to find a solution to this problem because it is costing our company financially in turnover, hurting our morale, and tarnishing our company’s reputation. On average, turnover is 70%. Morale is low in stores that do not have respectful, open lines of communication, and many good associates who could promote in the company and eventually run their own profitable stores, quit to work for other companies that treat their associates better. Although Walmart has great policies in place to ensure respectful and open communication, such as Walmart’s Values and Behaviors and The Open Door Communications Policy, they aren’t always followed as Mr. Sam intended.

SOLUTION:  We will build a PowerPoint Presentation to address this issue. In the PowerPoint, we will cover stress management, communicating with respect, and how to respond to another associate who is not communicating with respect and is being hostile to other associates. This PowerPoint will be presented by the Training Coordinator three times per day for a week, and three times overnight (may be presented by Overnight Assistant Manager). After the presentation associates will be given an assessment consisting of ten multiple-choice questions. The associate must pass with 80% or more, or will have to review the presentation.

This presentation and training will be mandatory for all hourly and salaried managers. The Training Coordinator will be responsible for ensuring completion of all associates. This will then be reported to the Market Human Resources Manager for training documentation and nationwide company compliance and certification.

METHODS:  Our team used the reflective thinking process to come up with an easy to implement solution to a perennial retail problem. Using team building skills and brainstorming, we were able to 1) define the problem, 2) analyze the problem, 3) establish criteria for a solution, 4) generate possible solutions to the problem, 5) decide on a solution, and 6) implement the solution. We met every week for four weeks to work together and compose a solution to the issue presented. Each week’s methods and progress will be lined out.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

CASE STUDY:  The following situation is a real situation one of our group members observed firsthand at a local Salt Lake City Walmart Supercenter. At this particular store, they are shorthanded on associates, both cashiers and salesfloor associates, especially in service areas. Most cashier-trained salesfloor associates come in at 1, and the bulk of the cashiers come in in the afternoon/evening, with usually six beginning at 2:00 p.m. This situation happened on a Saturday afternoon at 12:30 p.m., before the afternoon associates were arriving and while most of the morning associates were on lunch.

This situation happened between Co-Manager “Joseph” and Assistant Manager “Katie”. Katie is responsible for managing the front end, meaning the cashiers, courtesy associates, and service desk associates. She was conducting an interview with an applicant, and the front end was extremely busy. The CSM’s (Customer Service Supervisors) repeatedly called for help over the radio, even though all available cashier-trained associates were up there, including 2-3 other Assistant Managers. Co-Manager Joseph began to get angry that Katie wasn’t up assisting the front end. He kept calling for her over the radio, but she didn’t respond because she was conducting her interview. He finally found her in the personnel office, and the following altercation occurred in front of the applicant, her guardian, and many associates that were either in the office or in surrounding areas:
Joseph: So, are you just ignoring your radio?

Katie: No, I’m in an interview.

Joseph: So, you didn’t hear us calling for you?

Katie: No, I took my earpiece out.  I’m in an interview.

Joseph: Well ya coulda said that.  We need you on the front-end RIGHT NOW. YA OWN THE FRONT END!

Katie: I don’t think I appreciate the way you’re talking to me in front of my applicant. Joseph: Well if you don’t like it then we can talk about it in the office later.  (Storms off)
Walmart operates on 4 Basic Beliefs that Sam Walton, the company’s founder, created. They are 1) Respect for the Individual, 2) Service to the Customer, 3) Strive for Excellence, and 4) Act with Integrity.

Joseph was obviously trying to take care of the customers on the front end, but he will never get on a register himself, which violates rule number 2.  He seems to think that because he’s a Co he doesn’t have to actually help someone, but rather call and delegate the task to someone else, even if the customer has to wait ten times as long as it would have taken for him to help them.  He obviously violated rule number 1.  The rule at Walmart is if you have an issue with someone, you take it off the salesfloor, preferably into an office where you can discuss the issue RESPECTFULLY.  You never discuss it where customers can hear, and you don’t discuss it in front of other associates, coming back to rule #1.  Katie was appalled at how he had yelled at her in front of her applicant and other associates. Those that observed the altercation were speechless.

Joseph was stressed and angry that the front end was so busy, and he perceived that able associates were simply choosing not to help. He didn’t stop to think that they were possibly working on something equally important. He didn’t handle the situation well, and offended many associates and a potential associate.

Our group will analyze the problem and through the reflective thinking process we will come up with a solution to help associates handle stressful situations, how to communicate respectfully, and how to handle an associate that is being hostile and/or disrespectful.

DESIGNING THE TRAINING PROGRAM:

The proposed training was developed with three objectives in mind:

Objective #1: Employee’s will learn methods to communicate effectively and respectfully, during busy and stressful times.

Communication is a powerful tool and encompasses many aspects to be effective. Learning to communicate effectively takes practice, skill, and an ability to listen.

Objective #2: Provide tips on how to manage and balance stress within the workplace

Objective #3: Conflict resolution methods

The course will be delivered as mandatory training to ALL employees at Walmart. The training will be delivered via PowerPoint. The training will run the span of a week at a time, where employees will be able to access it numerous times throughout each shift. Employees will have to re-take the PowerPoint training 1x every calendar year.

Managers and Supervisors will allow employees to participate in the PowerPoint training during their scheduled shift, and arrange for proper coverage during the training.

Management will maintain a list of all employees that have completed the PowerPoint training and will be required to see that each employee completes it within the specified time frame.

DEVELOPING THE TRAINING PROGRAM:

After completing the PowerPoint training, each employee will be quizzed on his or her comprehension and knowledge of the training with a 10-question multiple choice quiz. They must pass with 80% or better, or will need to retake the PowerPoint training. Once an employee has passed with a satisfactory score, a certificate of completion will be generated for them to present to their immediate Supervisor. The certificate of completion should be added to each employee’s yearly training log.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM:

  1. Develop the PowerPoint training module.
  2. Create the pool of questions, select the ten best questions that will test comprehension and knowledge.
  3. Design the certificate that will be generated, once PP training has been passed successfully.
  4. Include Log for Managers to track employee completion of training.
  5. Create employee feedback form for comments about the training, such as ways to improve it, was it informative and helpful, was it easy to understand and comprehend?

EVALUATING THE TRAINING PROGRAM:

Level 1:

  • Evaluate employee feedback.
  • Determine if employees obtained the knowledge, skills, and attitudes intended with our training.

Level 2:

  • Determine if employees mastered the training material.
  • Make any necessary adjustments, additions, or modifications to our training PowerPoint for subsequent trainings.
  • Evaluate number of employees that didn’t complete the training and determine appropriate actions to take as this was a mandatory training.

Level 3:

  • Follow-up with employees at a quarterly staff meeting to see if employees have been able to implement the training.

 

Level 4:

  • Determine the value of the program. Was it beneficial as originally anticipated? Has it been effective in communicating the training we intended?
  • Has it been cost productive?


METHODS

We are trying to find a solution of how Co-Manager Joseph could have handled this situation better. Should he have been written up for his behavior? How we can prevent it from happening again? There was a lack of communication between Katie and Joseph. Joseph was demeaning and rude to Katie, and embarrassed her in front of an applicant. Our team used the reflective thinking process to find multiple solutions to our problem. After evaluating the situation that needs to be resolved, we used problem solving and critical thinking skills to determine some of the best and effective solutions.

SOLUTIONS THAT WERE USED IN THE PAST:

  • The Open Door Policy- Office door is open anytime for employees that have issues that needs to be discussed. It works very well to get problems resolved and keep lines of communication open. It’s one of the most effective policies.
  • Sundown Rule- Management that has brought an issue to answer the issue or get back with the employee giving them an update by sundown that day. It’s a simple way to solve a problem. But, it’s not so efficient if it’s a more complex problem, one that will take sometime to research. It helps everyone and does not hinder anyone.
  • Ethics Hotline- If an employee isn’t satisfied with an answer given after going though the local chain of command or if they want to report it anonymously, they can use this method. It can be more effective and efficient if the employee wants to remain anonymous or the situation warrants a solution outside the store. It helps employees who are afraid of retaliation. It does not hinder anyone. Sensitive issues have been resolved using the Ethics Hotline.
  • Coaching for Improvement Policy: First step is a conversation about what needs to change. Second, third, and fourth steps are written coaching, and after the third written the employee is terminated if said behavior has not changed.

 

SOLUTIONS WE BRAINSTORMED:

  1. Immediate discipline for associate that behaved badly.
  2. Provide additional team training to enhance cohesiveness.
  3. Cut some of the middle management. Not everyone should be in charge.
  4. Offer additional training on handling stressful situations.
  5. Provide a second option for back up when someone else is unable to be located.
  6. Discover a way in which employees can notify others of their status.
  7. Allow for a third party mediator to discuss the situation with employees who are in the conflict.
  8. Monitor peak times and don’t conduct interviews during peak times.
  9. Handle insubordination issues in a timely manner.
  10. Give employee a $1,000 bonus for having to navigate a hostile work environment.
  11. Utilize the Ethics Hotline.
  12. Escalate incident swiftly but with proper chain of command.

 

CONTINGENCIES:

  1. Associates don’t take or complete the training in a timely manner.
  2. Training is not considered “Mandatory” therefore, there’s no reason to take it.
  3. Training is not understood or taken seriously.
  4. Power Point is too time consuming so productivity is falling and work load is increasing.
  5. Not enough staffing to allow for presentation training.

HOW TO SOLVE THESE CONTINGENCIES:

  1. Set a specific time frame in which training will take place: Either as a new hire, or if not completed by a certain date/time access is revoked until completion.
  2. Making training “Mandatory.”
  3. Change Power Point to computer based module (CBL) when employees can take it when they have extra time.

OUR SOLUTION SHOULD:

  1. Create a solution that doesn’t allow for a hostile work environment.
  2. Allow for upper management to be more accountable for their actions.
  3. Should facilitate communication in a non-confrontational manner.
  4. Should allow for employees to be able to report up/down the chain of command.
  5. Needs to apply effective communication principles we are learning from class.


SOLUTION TABLE:

Solution 1

Provide a second option for back- up when someone is unable to be located

Solution 2

Provide additional team training to enhance cohesiveness

Solution 3

Offer additional training on handing stressful situations

Solution 4

Allow for a third party mediator to discuss the situation with employees who are in conflict

Solution 5

Monitor peak times and don’t conduct interviews during those peak times

Solution 6

Immediate discipline for associate that behaved poorly

Has to create an environment that doesn’t allow for a hostile work environment 5 5 5 4 5 1
Has to allow for upper management to be more accountable for their actions 5 5 5 5 5 5
Should facilitate communication in a non- confrontational manner 5 5 5 2 4 1
Should allow for employees to be able to report up/down the chain of command 5 3 3 5 4 5
 

 

Needs to allow for implementation of effective communication principles learned in class

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

4

Totals: 25 23 25 21 23 16

 

 

 


CONCLUSION

Retail life is always stressful. There are always too many customers, not enough associates, and too many tasks to complete. We all become overwhelmed and stressed, but we need to learn to deal with it effectively, and not take it out on those who are there to help us and work beside us. We need to communicate respectfully and effectively, and we also need to know how to respond to hostile and disrespectful situations without perpetuating the cycle.

Our group used a real-life case study of a hostile, stressful retail environment to propose a solution to teach employees how to handle stressful situations, how to communicate effectively and respectfully, and how to respond to hostility and disrespect in the workplace. Together over the course of four weeks we met, called, and e-mailed each other to keep our group project flowing well. Using the reflective thinking process, we were able to compose a brilliant solution to a perennial retail problem. We worked together very cohesively and constructively with constructive feedback to create the best possible solution. Luckily, we all worked equally hard and diligently, and we didn’t encounter any problems that groups typically encounter, such as members not doing their fair share of work, arguing, or not being able to decide on solutions or what member is assigned which part. We had a very constructive group, and this project has taught us many skills we will continue to use both in our personal and professional lives.


WORKS CITED AND CONSULTED:

Reflections of Comm 1010

When I first began this class, it seemed non-essential to me.  I have worked in retail for 15 years, and I have been a supervisor for more than half that time.  I have lead departments, teams, and now I lead half of the store, so it seemed like I had already learned everything this course was supposed to teach me how to do.  I’ve given presentations, led group meetings, worked on group projects, and communicate with countless people, both friendly and strangers, on a daily basis.

I was surprised at how much I didn’t know, and upon reflection, how much I could improve my communication skills.  I’ve learned how to be a better listener, how to communicate more clearly, and to really pay attention to the words I use and how I use them.  I am also more aware of my tone, body language, facial expressions, and my mood, so that I am not giving off a message that isn’t intended.

Already this class has taught me so many things, and I hope to employ these skills that I’ve honed as I continue my journey in retail, in college, and in my new career.

My Aikido Experience

Julie Stinson

April 27, 2016

HLAC-1440-001-Sp16

Aikido

My Personal Evaluation of my Aikido Class Experience

I decided to take Aikido because I needed my Health and Lifetime Activities credit. I felt like it would be cheating to take an easy class like yoga or bowling. I thought it would be good for me to learn something that would truly benefit me for more than one semester; something I could incorporate into my life. I wanted something that was going to challenge me, and I didn’t feel like the easier classes would. The other and probably most important reason I took this class is so I could learn self-defense. In November 2015 I ended a very abusive and manipulative relationship with my daughter’s father. In February 2014 he broke my left wrist in a psychotic rage, and in November 2015, the day I kicked him out of my house, he choked me because he didn’t want to take our 3-year-old to the pediatrician because she had come down with strep throat from her oldest sister. He wasn’t working and hadn’t been for a year and a half, and I had to work. He said, “I’m not gonna take her and you can’t make me because you’ll be at work.” He made me so angry that I pushed him. He threw me into the laundry hamper, destroying it. I pushed him again and he put me in a chokehold in front of 2 of my 3 daughters. He was trying to make me pass out and I was terrified, and I couldn’t get out of it. I was seeing stars and everything was going black. I tried scratching his neck but that didn’t work, so I reached over and grabbed him below the belt and twisted and pinched until he finally let me go. I didn’t call the police because I was afraid they would arrest me for scratching him. It made me so angry that I couldn’t get out of a simple chokehold. Now I am married to a 14-year veteran of the Peruvian army, but he won’t always be with me to protect me if my crazy ex shows up. My husband is filing for adoption for my now 5-year-old daughter, and I am afraid of what will happen when my ex finds out. But now that I have taken Aikido, even though it’s only one semester, I feel I am more confident and better able to protect myself or get away should a bad situation arise. I feel like I would be more proficient if I hadn’t had to sit out for 5 weeks with a severely sprained ankle, but some training is better than none, and I am considering looking up a local dojo for me and my family to attend.

When I first joined the class, I was nervous. I had never encountered Aikido before I saw it listed on the course selection of SLCC. I looked at some videos online, and I wasn’t sure I would be able to do what they were doing in the videos, but then I figured it’s a beginner course so I should be okay. After the first class, I couldn’t walk for 4 days because every muscle in my body, especially my quads and hamstrings, were in agony. Each Thursday after class I am so sore but I feel good about it because it means I am challenging myself. It makes me feel so confident that I can perform these new techniques. It makes me feel empowered and strong. When I come home I want to practice the moves on my daughters or husband but our townhome is too small and we don’t have mats.

I was also nervous about practicing with the guys in my class because I didn’t want to get hurt. Sometimes I didn’t like coming to class because quite a few of the guys didn’t use enough deodorant and they would smell horrible halfway through the class. Other people agreed with me. Also, when we would spend the first 20 minutes doing rolls back and forth across the mats, it was exhausting and it made me so dizzy. I believe this is the reason most of the class shows up late.

Sometimes I would get really frustrated with my classmates because I didn’t feel like they were really challenging me when they would attack me. Their stances, grips, and maneuvers were weak. I wanted to be able to practice with someone who was actually going to simulate an attacker. A lot of the time their grabs were very light and loose. Someone who is attacking me isn’t going to barely grip my arm. Also, the attacker isn’t going to gently and softly subdue me. I’m not saying I want MMA strength, but a challenging opponent so that I could practice in real life.

There is one girl in my class that I really didn’t like training with. Granted, she has some sort of bone disability, but she never would grip tightly at all. It was like she was just putting her hand on your arm, and when she was supposed to twist you, or push you, it was extremely soft, and I hate to say it but she never understood the techniques, and even if you showed her ten times how to do it, she didn’t understand it. I feel like myself and the rest of the class kind of humored her because we would always fall even if what she was doing wouldn’t make us fall, but because we wanted her to feel good, accepted, and as part of the class.

I did however enjoy training with a few of the guys in the class. I liked working with Luis because he always understood exactly how to do what we were learning, and if I didn’t understand he could teach me. He also wasn’t afraid to perform the techniques the way we were supposed to. He had a firm grip and was assertive. He was friendly and always cracking jokes so it was really fun to work with him. The time would go by quickly because it didn’t feel like you were practicing the same technique repeatedly; it was just fun.

I enjoyed practicing with Stephen as well. Since he is experienced in Aikido he could help me to understand a technique if I wasn’t getting it, and would give me pointers and tips. I liked how his experience as a Marine helped put a real world spin on what we were learning. He would explain what an attacker would really do instead of in a controlled sparring environment, and how to counteract it. He would ask me if I had any questions or if I wanted help learning something. When I went to the make-up practice at the Salt Lake Sports Complex he was there and I got to practice a lot with him, which helped so much. After the class had ended he offered to stay and go over the demonstration test to make sure I knew what I needed to know, but unfortunately I couldn’t stay because I had another commitment, or I would have. I didn’t like practicing with the other three guys who were attending that class that day because they were too gentle with me. I think they felt that because I was a woman they needed to treat me like I was made of porcelain or something. Stephen however gave me a challenge.

I really like how our sensei teaches us. He is very personable and relatable, and I like the jokes he makes all the time. He demonstrates the techniques using one of us as an uke many times, and then when he releases us to practice with partners he always demonstrates with all of us one-on-one. He also walks through the groups giving pointers and helping us perform the techniques correctly, answering any questions we may have or showing us how to do it again. He makes the environment feel relaxed and like we are a group of friends learning together. There isn’t the strong, cold distance between instructor and student one typically experiences in other courses. He wouldn’t just talk about Aikido. We’d talk about current events, and he always had stories of past experiences in his classes he taught or with other senseis he trained with or learned from, and they were always very interesting. I would suggest to my sensei to hem his hakama an inch or so. It’s very hard to learn the footwork to the techniques because we can’t see his feet. I am not sure if it is traditional for the hakama to cover his feet, and if it is then I would completely understand that he would want to respect it and not hem it, but I feel it would help his students so much.

I also like how our sensei branches out from traditional Aikido and teaches us things that are practical in real life, like how to evade multiple attackers or how to disarm someone with a knife. He told us other senseis have criticized us for teaching us things that are normally not taught in a beginner class, but he wants us to be prepared for what we might encounter in the real world. I was so happy when he was teaching us how to get out of a chokehold. That is what I was waiting for all semester.

My favorite technique we learned was kosa dori ikkyo omote. I felt it was one of the most useful techniques we could have learned. Now, if someone is going to grab my arm, I can easily put him to the ground, no matter how big he is. All I have to do is control his elbow, and he is mine to control. Katate dori tainohenko seemed not useful when we first learned it, but then I realized that if someone grabs my arm, all I have to do is step next to them, and they can’t grip me and I can get away. Ryote dori tenchinage was a really fun technique to learn, because sensei told us to think of it as we were shoving a pie in our opponent’s face. Now when we do this technique that’s all I can imagine. Tenchinage means “heaven and earth”, and when you perform the technique you raise one arm up high (to heaven) and one arm down low (to earth) and knock your opponent off balance, then it’s very easy to push them over. Now I laugh a little whenever I see or do this technique, because it makes me think of all the pie jokes.

One thing I would suggest to our sensei to change about the class is to make sure we are learning the terms and names of the techniques. He would always write them on the whiteboard but we were told we didn’t need to bring a notepad or anything to class, so none of us ever paid much attention to the terms and names. But the day we went over the demonstration test we found out we had to know the names of each technique. It would be helpful if sensei had told us we had to know them from the beginning of the class. We could have written them down and a summary of how to perform each technique, or definitions of the terms. I still have no idea what we say when we bow goodbye. I speak it the best I can, but I know I’m not saying it correctly. I think a syllabus with the definition and description of what we’re learning each week would be very helpful.

Overall I greatly enjoyed this class. Sometimes it was hard to get myself to go because it was so strenuous at first, but the more I practiced the more my body got used to it. The first couple weeks I would end up needing to take Epsom salt baths on Thursdays and Fridays so I could get my body functioning before I had to start another four-day rotation at work. Now it’s become a lot less painful. I was so happy when I was able to rejoin the class after my injury had almost completely healed. I feel so much more confident and strong, and like I can defend myself if necessary without fear. I love the feeling when I leave class, when I’m hot and sweaty and my muscles are tired. It makes me feel accomplished. I try hard to learn the techniques correctly and also to help my fellow classmates learn them too. A lot of the time we’re all a little confused, but together we manage to figure it out.

English 2010 Introductions

When I began this course, I thought it would be a piece of cake.  I thought that I would need to put in considerable time to complete the projects, but I consider myself well educated in English composition so I thought I would be able to breeze through the course.  I was wrong.  I was considerably challenged throughout this course, and it has made me a much stronger writer.  My rhetorical skills have improved dramatically, as is evident in the different tones and languages from my first piece to my final piece.  I realize now that my writing isn’t just to show my skills of piecing information together in a technical format, but to instill ethos, pathos, and logos in my audience; to make them feel what I feel and understand my point of view, even if it differs from their own.  I need to coerce, to empower, and to change people, with my writing.

When we were first assigned to create a meme, I was a bit astonished.  I never considered memes to be anything but something entertaining online.  But, when we had to create one based on local recent events, it was challenging.  It was challenging to find such a specific topic (as in something not typical and broad such as gay marriage or Planned Parenthood), and to come up with an image and phrase that wasn’t so cliche.  After completing this assignment, I understood that a meme can be powerful, meaningful, and strong.

The most challenging assignment for me was the photo essay because I am not technology literate.  I am part of the generation where we wrote on paper, and typed final drafts on a computer; we did research in books in the library.  The generation just after me grew up with technology in their hands.  I worked online with a dial-up modem that would drop the connection if someone picked up the phone in the house.  For the life of me I could not figure out how to use Slideshare.  I tried for hours to no avail.  I never knew about Creative Commons, a place where I can get images to freely use in my writing.  I never thought of a slideshow as a “photo essay.”  To me, images were added bonuses to writing, not essential parts.  This has really changed how I think about and compose my writing.

The piece I feel the most strongly about, that represents civic engagement and that I want to share online with everyone I can reach is my position paper on the Syrian refugee crisis.  I cannot believe how people can be so uneducated, naïve, and cruel when this topic arises.  It angers me.  People are dying through no fault of their own, because of where they live, and it seems like most people are sticking their noses up and refusing to even really research the issue, and help our fellow people.  Innocent people are dying by the thousands, and all people here see are that they’re Muslim and therefore below us and undeserving of help.  I equate this manner of thinking the same as how the Jews were treated by the Nazis, and how the early American people treated the Native Americans and the slaves they brought over.  I want to change the world with this paper.

Each piece I have written has meaning to me, and I think that’s been the best part of this class.  It wasn’t just research papers or book reports, or grading based on technical writing.  It was writing that mattered.  That’s my biggest take away from this course.

Here is a brief introduction to the four pieces from this course that I am including in my portfolio:

Research Paper: Best Friends Animal Sanctuary: Saving Lives Through Sanctuary And Ending Euthanasia

This paper is where I first learned how to do good research online.  I’d never written a paper before using solely online references.  In fact, in my first course when I returned to college, Geology 1010, we were assigned a research paper which prohibited online sources.  It was a bit of a struggle for me to learn to use the college’s online library, but after a few tries I got the hang of it.  After that, I used more sources than was required, because I wanted to be sure to have all the information I could at my disposal, to compose the best paper possible.  My paper is intended for those who do not understand that simple things, like spaying and neutering, or adopting versus buying animals from puppy mills or breeders, can save thousands of lives.  It is intended for those who are not sure where to get their new pet from, and those who want to help the animal community but aren’t sure how.  I try very hard to persuade my readers and make them understand the significant impact they can have, even by just donating a few hours of volunteer work to their local shelter.  The images I used tied directly into each topic in my paper: the Best Friends Animal Sanctuary in Kanab, Bela the German Shepherd who was almost euthanized due to his owner’s will, and how there could be a wonderful outcome of animals saved when Michael Vick’s dogfighting ring was discovered.  It was a challenge to learn to use MLA format for my resources, but after practicing it, it became more easy.

Infographic: Euthanasia

To create this infographic, I used the research I had already gathered for my research paper about sanctuary and No More Homeless Pets.  I had never created one before, but it was surprisingly easy.  It is intended to circulate in social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, where it is easily shared and thousands of people per day can see it.  The hardest part was deciding what information was vital enough to make the final cut, because it all seemed important to me.  I was very happy with the final look and feel of it.  It was the strongest facts, the ones that would garner the most attention, and appeal strongly to the ethos and pathos in my readers.

Position Paper: The Syrian Refugee Crisis: A Global Disaster

This piece is my pride and joy of this course.  I talk about it all the time at work.  I work for Wal-Mart, and I would honestly say that at least half of the employees at my store are refugees.  They are from so many countries: Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Sudan, and Ethiopia, to name a few.  We also have immigrants from all over the world: the Philippines, Vietnam, Peru, Chile, Argentina, Congo, Uruguay, and more.  Because I know these people are good people, people just like you or me, the average American, fighting for a better life for ourselves and our families, I feel very strongly about helping the people of Syria escape the horrors of their lives there.  I spent hours researching and educating myself on this topic before I even began to compose my paper.  I am always posting and sharing articles online about this crisis, and when people say hateful things like “all Muslims should be banned” or “No Syrian refugees are welcome in my state,” I encourage them to actually research the issue at hand, and I can easily rattle off fact after fact, instead of responding with anger and argument.  The images were the hardest part of this paper, because many of them are gruesome and graphic, and I didn’t want to turn my paper into a horror show.  I was excited to learn with this paper that I could use online videos as sources.  That made a world of difference.  I had to learn how to cite them, and that was a bit of a challenge, but I was successful.  Once again I employed more references than was necessary to meet the requirements for the assignment, but I felt it was necessary.

Photo Essay: Syrian Refugee Crisis

This was hands down the most challenging assignment I had in this course.  I was so stuck trying to create this.  As mentioned before, I could not figure out how to use the website.  Even registering to use it was a challenge.  I ended up forfeiting the points on this one because I simply could not get it done.  I finally ended up using a format I understand more, PowerPoint, to create the slideshow.  Then the most difficult part was trying to choose what images to use, because there are so many that are so moving, but I didn’t want anything really disturbing or horrific.  I looked for images that were moving, but could be viewed by anyone.  I tried to keep in mind what I would want my children to see, or someone who is conservative in nature and easily offended.  As I composed this piece I referred back to my position paper, and followed along with what I had written, because I felt my position paper was laid out very well.  I used Creative Commons to find my images, which made the process much easier.  I would like to see it circulated in social media, perhaps on political blogs, and really I would like to see it circulated in a forum where people are against helping the Syrian refugees, and hopefully change a few minds and hearts.  I really want to engage people in this topic.  I feel like if we could get enough movement, we could really save lives, and make all the difference in the world.  This piece is designed to stir the emotions of the reader; to make their heart ache for the people of Syria.

I hope you have enjoyed my compositions, and I hope they move you.  Feel free to share, as every piece is intended to save lives through education, compassion, and helping those who cannot help themselves.